“Demonstrative Disputation: A contradictio in adjecto? Medieval and Recent Commentators on Aristotle’s Sophistical Refutations”. 101–108 in Ebbesen, Bloch, Fink, Hansen, and Mora Márquez 2014.Įbbesen, S. “ContextSensitive Argumentation: Dirty Tricks in the Sophistical Refutations and a Perceptive Medieval Interpretation of the Text”. L’enseignement de la philosophie au XIIIe siècle. “Form and Matter of the Syllogism in Anonymus Cantabrigiensis”. Gustavo Fernandez Walker, University of GothenburgīrumbergChaumont, J. Needless to say, it is of great value for scholars interested in the reception of this particular item of the corpus Aristotelicum, especially since the editor is responsible for much of our current knowledge within the field.Ĭopyright © 2021 by Gustavo Fernandez WalkerĬorresponding Author: Gustavo Fernandez Walker, The publication of the critical edition of this anonymous commentary on Aristotle’s Sophistical Refutations is something to be celebrated for numerous reasons. Aristotle, Anonymus Cantabrigiensis, Commentarium in Sophisticos Elenchos Aristotelis, Sten Ebbesen Abstract
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |